​
​
Sign In
  • Support FanGraphs
    FanGraphs Membership
    FanGraphs Shirts
    FanGraphs Mugs
    Gift a Membership
    Donate to FanGraphs
  • Fantasy
    Fantasy Tools
    Fantasy Player Rater
    Auction Calculator
    Ottoneu Fantasy Baseball
    Signup, FAQ, Blog Posts
  • Blogs
    Blog Roll

    FanGraphs
      Podcasts: Effectively Wild

      FanGraphs Prospects

      RotoGraphs
        Podcasts: The Sleeper and The Bust | Field of Streams | Beat the Shift

        Community Research

          Archived Blogs: The Hardball Times | NotGraphs | TechGraphs | FanGraphs+
          Archived THT: THT Live | Dispatch | Fantasy | ShysterBall
          Archived Podcasts: FanGraphs Audio | Chin Music | UMP: The Untitled McDongenhagen Project | Stealing Home | Doing It For Bartolo | OttoGraphs |
        • Projections
          2025 Pre-Season Projections
          ZiPS, ZiPS DC
          Steamer
          Depth Charts
          ATC
          THE BAT, THE BAT X
          OOPSY
          2025 600 PA / 200 IP Projections
          Steamer600, Steamer600 (Update)
          2025 Updated In-Season Projections
          ZiPS (RoS), ZiPS (Update), ZiPS DC (RoS)
          Steamer (RoS), Steamer (Update)
          Depth Charts (RoS)
          ATC DC (RoS)
          THE BAT (RoS), THE BAT X (RoS)
          OOPSY DC (RoS)
          3-Year Projections
          ZiPS 2026, ZiPS 2027
          On-Pace Leaders
          Every Game Played, Games Played %
          Cy Young Award Projections

          Auction Calculator
        • Scores
          Today
          Live Scoreboard, Probable Pitchers
          Live Daily Leaderboards
          Win Probability & Box Scores
          2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019
          AL Games
          NL Games
        • Standings
          2025 Projected Standings
          2025 Playoff Odds, Playoff Odds Graphs
          2024 ZiPS Postseason Game-By-Game Odds
          AL East
          AL Central
          AL West
          NL East
          NL Central
          NL West
        • Leaders
          Major League Leaders
          Batting: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, Career
          Pitching: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, Career
          Fielding: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, Career
          Major League Leaders - Rank
          Batting: Ranking Grid, Compare Players, Compare Stats
          Pitching: Ranking Grid, Compare Players, Compare Stats
          Splits Leaderboards
          Season Stat Grid

          Postseason Leaders
          Batting: 2024, (WS), (LCS), (LDS), (WCS), Career
          Pitching: 2024, (WS), (LCS), (LDS), (WCS), Career

          Spring Training Leaders
          Batting: 2025, 2024, 2023
          Pitching: 2025, 2024, 2023

          KBO Leaders
          Batting, Pitching
          NPB Leaders
          Batting, Pitching

          Minor League Leaders
          AAA: International League, Pacific Coast League
          AA: Eastern League, Southern League, Texas League
          A+: Midwest League, South Atlantic League, Northwest League
          A: California League, Carolina League, Florida State League
          CPX: Arizona, Florida
          R: Dominican Summer League
          College Leaders
          Batting, Pitching

          WAR Tools
          Combined WAR Leaderboards
          WAR Graphs
          WPA Tools
          WPA Inquirer
          Rookie Leaders
          Batters 2025, Pitchers 2025
          Splits Leaders
          Batters: vs L, vs R, Home, Away
          Pitchers: vs L, vs R, Home, Away
        • Teams
          Team Batting Stats
          2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020
          Team Pitching Stats
          2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020
          Team WAR Totals (RoS)
          AL East
          Blue Jays  |  DC
          Orioles  |  DC
          Rays  |  DC
          Red Sox  |  DC
          Yankees  |  DC
          AL Central
          Guardians  |  DC
          Royals  |  DC
          Tigers  |  DC
          Twins  |  DC
          White Sox  |  DC
          AL West
          Angels  |  DC
          Astros  |  DC
          Athletics  |  DC
          Mariners  |  DC
          Rangers  |  DC
          NL East
          Braves  |  DC
          Marlins  |  DC
          Mets  |  DC
          Nationals  |  DC
          Phillies  |  DC
          NL Central
          Brewers  |  DC
          Cardinals  |  DC
          Cubs  |  DC
          Pirates  |  DC
          Reds  |  DC
          NL West
          D-backs  |  DC
          Dodgers  |  DC
          Giants  |  DC
          Padres  |  DC
          Rockies  |  DC
          Positional Depth Charts
          Batters: C, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B, LF, CF, RF, DH
          Pitchers: SP, RP
        • RosterResource
          Current Depth Charts
          AL East
          Blue Jays
          Orioles
          Rays
          Red Sox
          Yankees
          AL Central
          Guardians
          Royals
          Tigers
          Twins
          White Sox
          AL West
          Angels
          Astros
          Athletics
          Mariners
          Rangers
          NL East
          Braves
          Marlins
          Mets
          Nationals
          Phillies
          NL Central
          Brewers
          Cardinals
          Cubs
          Pirates
          Reds
          NL West
          D-backs
          Dodgers
          Giants
          Padres
          Rockies
          In-Season Tools
          2025 Closer Depth Chart
          2025 Injury Report
          2025 Payroll Pages
          2025 Transaction Tracker
          2025 Schedule Grid
          2025 Probables Grid
          2025 Lineup Tracker
          2025 Minor League Power Rankings
          Offseason Tools
          2025 Free Agent Tracker
          2025 Offseason Tracker
          2025 Opening Day Tracker
        • Prospects
          Prospects Home
          The Board
          The Board: Scouting + Stats!
          How To Use The Board: A Tutorial
          Farm System Rankings

          Top Prospects List
          20252024
          AL
          BALCHWATH
          BOSCLEHOU
          NYYDETLAA
          TBRKCRSEA
          TORMINTEX
          NL
          ATLCHCARI
          MIACINCOL
          NYMMILLAD
          PHIPITSDP
          WSNSTLSFG
          2025 Preseason Top 100
        • Glossary
          Library
          Batting Stats
          wOBA, wRC+, ISO, K% & BB%, more...
          Pitching Stats
          FIP, xFIP, BABIP, K/9 & BB/9, more...
          Defensive Stats
          UZR Primer, DRS, FSR, TZ & TZL, more...
          More
          WAR, UBR Primer, WPA, LI, Clutch
          Guts!
          Seasonal Constants
          Park Factors
          Park Factors by Handedness
        • Sign In
        • Intro
        • Features
        • Offense
          • Complete List (Offense)
          • OBP
          • OPS and OPS+
          • wOBA
          • wRC and wRC+
          • wRAA
          • Off
          • BsR
          • UBR
          • wSB
          • wGDP
          • BABIP
          • ISO
          • HR/FB
          • Spd
          • Pull%/Cent%/Oppo%
          • Soft%/Med%/Hard%
          • GB%, LD%, FB%
          • K% and BB%
          • Plate Discipline (O-Swing%, Z-Swing%, etc.)
          • Pitch Type Linear Weights
          • Pace
        • Defense
          • Overview
          • Def
          • UZR
          • DRS
          • Defensive Runs Saved – 2020 Update
          • Inside Edge Fielding
          • Catcher Defense
          • FSR
          • RZR
          • TZ / TZL
        • Pitching
          • Complete List (Pitching)
          • PitchingBot Pitch Modeling Primer
          • Stuff+, Location+, and Pitching+ Primer
          • ERA
          • WHIP
          • FIP
          • xFIP
          • SIERA
          • Strikeout and Walk Rates
          • Pull%/Cent%/Oppo%
          • Soft%/Med%/Hard%
          • GB%, LD%, FB%
          • BABIP
          • HR/FB
          • LOB%
          • Pitch Type Linear Weights
          • SD / MD
          • ERA- / FIP- / xFIP-
          • Plate Discipline (O-Swing%, Z-Swing%, etc.)
          • Pace
          • PITCHF/x
            • What is PITCHF/x?
            • Pitch Type Abbreviations & Classifications
            • Heat Maps
            • Common Mistakes
            • PITCHf/x Resources
        • WE/RE/LI
          • RE24
          • Win Expectancy
          • WPA
          • LI
          • WPA/LI
          • Clutch
        • Principles
          • DIPS
          • Regression toward the Mean
          • Replacement Level
          • Sample Size
          • Splits
          • Projection Systems
          • Linear Weights
          • Counting vs. Rate Statistics
          • Park Factors
          • Park Factors – 5 Year Regressed
          • Positional Adjustment
          • Aging Curve
          • League Equivalencies
          • Pythagorean Win-Loss
          • Luck
        • WAR
          • What is WAR?
          • WAR for Position Players
          • WAR for Pitchers
          • FDP
          • fWAR, rWAR, and WARP
          • WAR Misconceptions
        • Business

        FIP May Look Like ERA, But It’s Designed Like wOBA

        by Neil Weinberg
        May 11, 2016

        If you have at least a passing familiarity with sabermetrics, you’ve probably heard something like this: Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) is what a pitcher’s ERA should have been based on his walks, hit batters, strikeouts, and home runs. In other words, FIP is described as a predictive tool to tell you what should have happened rather than as a retrospective assessment of actual pitcher performance.

        But this is wrong. This is a shorthand way of describing FIP that well-meaning analysts (myself included) have used, but I’ve come to realize that by aiming to put FIP in terms of ERA, we’ve actually made it more difficult for people to grasp and embrace what FIP is really telling us. It’s time to change the way we talk about FIP, because while the concept of defense independent stats has gained popularity, there is often push back (by some) against FIP as a measure of value, in part, because of less than ideal presentation.

        The central problem is that FIP is sold as a better version of ERA that is based on the outcomes a pitcher controls independent of his defense. The problem with this presentation — a problem its inventor, Tom Tango, likely understood when he created it — is that FIP is actually nothing like ERA in terms of how it’s created. ERA tracks the number of earned runs (you can apply this to RA9 too) credited to the pitcher. ERA and RA9 are simple, results-based, context dependent stats. ERA is like RBI or runs scored. It doesn’t matter what caused a run to score as long as it did score.

        To make a more flattering comparison, ERA is like a less sophisticated RE24 or WPA. ERA fails to properly account for runners left on based for relievers and unearned runs, but ERA and RE24 don’t care how well you pitched to individual batters; they care how those individual plate appearances blended together. (As an aside, RA9 is superior to ERA but that’s for another day.)

        FIP doesn’t care if the runs score or don’t score, it cares what you did during individual plate appearances. In this way, FIP is much more like Weighted On-Base Average (wOBA) than it is ERA. In fact, there’s a good case to be made that FIP is exactly like wOBA in it’s construct.

        In wOBA, batters get credit for BB, HBP, 1B, 2B, 3B, and HR based on the relative value of each of those events using a methodology called Linear Weights. Putting wOBA on a scale equal to OBP wasn’t the only way to implement a stat like this. Baseball Prospectus has a similar stat scaled to batting average. It could be scaled to anything! Scaling is just about presentation.

        FIP is the same way. FIP gives pitchers credit based on the individual batter-pitcher results, not the results for the full inning. You could simply look at pitcher wOBA, but research by Voros McCracken found that pitchers have very little control over results on balls put into play. In other words, it doesn’t seem like pitchers have much control over the rates at which batted balls become outs or hits.

        There is disagreement about this point, but it’s secondary to this particular argument. If you think pitchers can truly control their BABIP, that is a separate question. If you think they can truly influence weak contact that leads to more outs on balls in play, FIP just isn’t going to be the method for you and you could turn to pitcher wOBA. But that doesn’t mean FIP fails as a retrospective statistic.

        Pitchers control whether the outcome is a strikeout, walk/hit batter, home run, or ball in play independent of their defense. There’s really no argument here (ignoring the catcher). So what Tom Tango did with FIP is used linear weights to determine the relative values of walks/hit batters, strikeouts, home runs, and balls in play. He could have stopped right there and had a statistic that weighed these four categories per plate appearance, but he chose to scale it to ERA to make it easier to determine whether a pitcher had a good FIP. I think has led to the problematic language we use to talk about FIP.

        FIP classifies pitching outcomes into four buckets and judges pitchers based on the relative value of those outcomes in a context neutral way.  We use FIP instead of pitcher wOBA because of McCracken’s BABIP findings, but we use FIP/wOBA when we are trying to measure pitchers based on individual events, not in terms of how particular innings unfolded.

        FIP is designed so that every ball in play is treated the same. wOBA is designed so that every single, etc is treated the same. ERA and RE24 treat singles differently depending on what happened in the previous plate appearance. That might be a worthwhile question, but it is a fundamentally different question. And this is why I think we made a mistake in scaling FIP to ERA. It makes people think it should behave the way ERA behaves when it, for better or worse, behaves like wOBA.

        I am not arguing that this is a normative good, just that it is the truth. You might think that this isn’t a good way to talk about pitcher value, but it is a way to talk about pitcher value. FIP isn’t designed to predict the future, it’s designed to reflect the past based on those four buckets of outcomes. It is a measure of how the pitcher actually pitched.

        It’s probably a worthwhile pursuit to measure players with context neutral and context dependent stats. I’m not going to advocate for one or the other in this article, but I think it’s important to understand the difference as it relates to FIP. No one would say wOBA isn’t what actually happened and you shouldn’t say it about FIP. FIP isn’t trying to be ERA, we’ve forced it into the ERA mold for the wrong reasons.

        Fortunately, we have minus stats. FIP- uses the same inputs and spits out a number relative to league average. Saying a pitcher’s fielding independent numbers are 10% better than average is a better way to communicate the concept than saying he has a 3.60 FIP. Saying “3.60 FIP” implies we’re trying to tell you something about his ERA and that’s not really what we’re doing. FIP is saying that if you chose to judge a pitcher in a context-neutral way based on these four buckets of outcomes, this is how well he has pitched. Maybe you don’t care about that question, but it’s time for us to separate FIP and ERA in the way that we separate wOBA and RE24.





        The Beginner’s Guide To Deriving wOBA
         
        The Beginner’s Guide To Using FanGraphs Shift Data

        Neil Weinberg is the Site Educator at FanGraphs and can be found writing enthusiastically about the Detroit Tigers at New English D. Follow and interact with him on Twitter @NeilWeinberg44.

        2 Comments
        Oldest
        Newest Most Voted
        Inline Feedbacks
        View all comments
        TangotigerMember since 2016
        8 years ago

        I agree with the analogy of FIP to wOBA. They both:

        1. use a subset of performances(*)
        2. weight the values based on their run impact, regardless of when they happened
        3. scaled to a common scale

        (*) FIP ignores batted balls in field of play, and baserunner movement (SB, CS, WP, etc). wOBA ignores baserunner movement.

        3
        RedsManRickMember since 2020
        8 years ago

        It seems worth mentioning that part of the reason that FIP is occasionally used as an ERA predictor is that it happens to be more predictive of future ERA than ERA itself. Even if it wasn’t designed for the purpose, it happens to be the “best” tool for the job quite often — “best” defined as some combination of accuracy, availability, and explainability, and familiarity.

        6
        You are going to send email to

        Move Comment

        Updated: Thursday, May 8, 2025 11:36 PM ETUpdated: 5/8/2025 11:36 PM ET
        @fangraphs - Contact Us - Advertise - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
        sis_logo
        All major league baseball data including pitch type, velocity, batted ball location, and play-by-play data provided by Sports Info Solutions.
        mlb logo
        Major League and Minor League Baseball data provided by Major League Baseball.
        Mitchel Lichtman
        All UZR (ultimate zone rating) calculations are provided courtesy of Mitchel Lichtman.
        TangoTiger.com
        All Win Expectancy, Leverage Index, Run Expectancy, and Fans Scouting Report data licenced from TangoTiger.com
        Retrosheet.org
        Play-by-play data prior to 2002 was obtained free of charge from and is copyrighted by Retrosheet.