​
​
Sign In
  • Support FanGraphs
    FanGraphs Membership
    FanGraphs Shirts
    FanGraphs Mugs
    Gift a Membership
    Donate to FanGraphs
  • Fantasy
    Fantasy Tools
    Fantasy Player Rater
    Auction Calculator
    Ottoneu Fantasy Baseball
    Signup, FAQ, Blog Posts
  • Blogs
    Blog Roll

    FanGraphs
      Podcasts: Effectively Wild

      FanGraphs Prospects

      RotoGraphs
        Podcasts: The Sleeper and The Bust | Field of Streams | Beat the Shift

        Community Research

          Archived Blogs: The Hardball Times | NotGraphs | TechGraphs | FanGraphs+
          Archived THT: THT Live | Dispatch | Fantasy | ShysterBall
          Archived Podcasts: FanGraphs Audio | Chin Music | UMP: The Untitled McDongenhagen Project | Stealing Home | Doing It For Bartolo | OttoGraphs |
        • Projections
          2025 Pre-Season Projections
          ZiPS, ZiPS DC
          Steamer
          Depth Charts
          ATC
          THE BAT, THE BAT X
          OOPSY
          2025 600 PA / 200 IP Projections
          Steamer600, Steamer600 (Update)
          2025 Updated In-Season Projections
          ZiPS (RoS), ZiPS (Update), ZiPS DC (RoS)
          Steamer (RoS), Steamer (Update)
          Depth Charts (RoS)
          ATC DC (RoS)
          THE BAT (RoS), THE BAT X (RoS)
          OOPSY DC (RoS)
          3-Year Projections
          ZiPS 2026, ZiPS 2027
          On-Pace Leaders
          Every Game Played, Games Played %
          Cy Young Award Projections

          Auction Calculator
        • Scores
          Today
          Live Scoreboard, Probable Pitchers
          Live Daily Leaderboards
          Win Probability & Box Scores
          2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019
          AL Games
          NL Games
        • Standings
          2025 Projected Standings
          2025 Playoff Odds, Playoff Odds Graphs
          2024 ZiPS Postseason Game-By-Game Odds
          AL East
          AL Central
          AL West
          NL East
          NL Central
          NL West
        • Leaders
          Major League Leaders
          Batting: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, Career
          Pitching: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, Career
          Fielding: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, Career
          Major League Leaders - Rank
          Batting: Ranking Grid, Compare Players, Compare Stats
          Pitching: Ranking Grid, Compare Players, Compare Stats
          Splits Leaderboards
          Season Stat Grid

          Postseason Leaders
          Batting: 2024, (WS), (LCS), (LDS), (WCS), Career
          Pitching: 2024, (WS), (LCS), (LDS), (WCS), Career

          Spring Training Leaders
          Batting: 2025, 2024, 2023
          Pitching: 2025, 2024, 2023

          KBO Leaders
          Batting, Pitching
          NPB Leaders
          Batting, Pitching

          Minor League Leaders
          AAA: International League, Pacific Coast League
          AA: Eastern League, Southern League, Texas League
          A+: Midwest League, South Atlantic League, Northwest League
          A: California League, Carolina League, Florida State League
          CPX: Arizona, Florida
          R: Dominican Summer League
          College Leaders
          Batting, Pitching

          WAR Tools
          Combined WAR Leaderboards
          WAR Graphs
          WPA Tools
          WPA Inquirer
          Rookie Leaders
          Batters 2025, Pitchers 2025
          Splits Leaders
          Batters: vs L, vs R, Home, Away
          Pitchers: vs L, vs R, Home, Away
        • Teams
          Team Batting Stats
          2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020
          Team Pitching Stats
          2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020
          Team WAR Totals (RoS)
          AL East
          Blue Jays  |  DC
          Orioles  |  DC
          Rays  |  DC
          Red Sox  |  DC
          Yankees  |  DC
          AL Central
          Guardians  |  DC
          Royals  |  DC
          Tigers  |  DC
          Twins  |  DC
          White Sox  |  DC
          AL West
          Angels  |  DC
          Astros  |  DC
          Athletics  |  DC
          Mariners  |  DC
          Rangers  |  DC
          NL East
          Braves  |  DC
          Marlins  |  DC
          Mets  |  DC
          Nationals  |  DC
          Phillies  |  DC
          NL Central
          Brewers  |  DC
          Cardinals  |  DC
          Cubs  |  DC
          Pirates  |  DC
          Reds  |  DC
          NL West
          D-backs  |  DC
          Dodgers  |  DC
          Giants  |  DC
          Padres  |  DC
          Rockies  |  DC
          Positional Depth Charts
          Batters: C, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B, LF, CF, RF, DH
          Pitchers: SP, RP
        • RosterResource
          Current Depth Charts
          AL East
          Blue Jays
          Orioles
          Rays
          Red Sox
          Yankees
          AL Central
          Guardians
          Royals
          Tigers
          Twins
          White Sox
          AL West
          Angels
          Astros
          Athletics
          Mariners
          Rangers
          NL East
          Braves
          Marlins
          Mets
          Nationals
          Phillies
          NL Central
          Brewers
          Cardinals
          Cubs
          Pirates
          Reds
          NL West
          D-backs
          Dodgers
          Giants
          Padres
          Rockies
          In-Season Tools
          2025 Closer Depth Chart
          2025 Injury Report
          2025 Payroll Pages
          2025 Transaction Tracker
          2025 Schedule Grid
          2025 Probables Grid
          2025 Lineup Tracker
          2025 Minor League Power Rankings
          Offseason Tools
          2025 Free Agent Tracker
          2025 Offseason Tracker
          2025 Opening Day Tracker
        • Prospects
          Prospects Home
          The Board
          The Board: Scouting + Stats!
          How To Use The Board: A Tutorial
          Farm System Rankings

          Top Prospects List
          20252024
          AL
          BALCHWATH
          BOSCLEHOU
          NYYDETLAA
          TBRKCRSEA
          TORMINTEX
          NL
          ATLCHCARI
          MIACINCOL
          NYMMILLAD
          PHIPITSDP
          WSNSTLSFG
          2025 Preseason Top 100
        • Glossary
          Library
          Batting Stats
          wOBA, wRC+, ISO, K% & BB%, more...
          Pitching Stats
          FIP, xFIP, BABIP, K/9 & BB/9, more...
          Defensive Stats
          UZR Primer, DRS, FSR, TZ & TZL, more...
          More
          WAR, UBR Primer, WPA, LI, Clutch
          Guts!
          Seasonal Constants
          Park Factors
          Park Factors by Handedness
        • Sign In
        • Intro
        • Features
        • Offense
          • Complete List (Offense)
          • OBP
          • OPS and OPS+
          • wOBA
          • wRC and wRC+
          • wRAA
          • Off
          • BsR
          • UBR
          • wSB
          • wGDP
          • BABIP
          • ISO
          • HR/FB
          • Spd
          • Pull%/Cent%/Oppo%
          • Soft%/Med%/Hard%
          • GB%, LD%, FB%
          • K% and BB%
          • Plate Discipline (O-Swing%, Z-Swing%, etc.)
          • Pitch Type Linear Weights
          • Pace
        • Defense
          • Overview
          • Def
          • UZR
          • DRS
          • Defensive Runs Saved – 2020 Update
          • Inside Edge Fielding
          • Catcher Defense
          • FSR
          • RZR
          • TZ / TZL
        • Pitching
          • Complete List (Pitching)
          • PitchingBot Pitch Modeling Primer
          • Stuff+, Location+, and Pitching+ Primer
          • ERA
          • WHIP
          • FIP
          • xFIP
          • SIERA
          • Strikeout and Walk Rates
          • Pull%/Cent%/Oppo%
          • Soft%/Med%/Hard%
          • GB%, LD%, FB%
          • BABIP
          • HR/FB
          • LOB%
          • Pitch Type Linear Weights
          • SD / MD
          • ERA- / FIP- / xFIP-
          • Plate Discipline (O-Swing%, Z-Swing%, etc.)
          • Pace
          • PITCHF/x
            • What is PITCHF/x?
            • Pitch Type Abbreviations & Classifications
            • Heat Maps
            • Common Mistakes
            • PITCHf/x Resources
        • WE/RE/LI
          • RE24
          • Win Expectancy
          • WPA
          • LI
          • WPA/LI
          • Clutch
        • Principles
          • DIPS
          • Regression toward the Mean
          • Replacement Level
          • Sample Size
          • Splits
          • Projection Systems
          • Linear Weights
          • Counting vs. Rate Statistics
          • Park Factors
          • Park Factors – 5 Year Regressed
          • Positional Adjustment
          • Aging Curve
          • League Equivalencies
          • Pythagorean Win-Loss
          • Luck
        • WAR
          • What is WAR?
          • WAR for Position Players
          • WAR for Pitchers
          • FDP
          • fWAR, rWAR, and WARP
          • WAR Misconceptions
        • Business

        The Biggest ERA-FIP Differences of 2014

        by Neil Weinberg
        October 6, 2014

        Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) is one of the more prominently featured statistics on FanGraphs and one of the bedrocks of sabermetric analysis. We all know that FIP is an imperfect measure of pitcher performance because it assumes average results on all balls in play, but we also know that it does a better job isolating the individual pitcher’s performance than simply looking at their ERA or RA9 because it only looks at strikeouts, walks, home runs, and hit batters. It’s a very informative tool, but it’s a metric derived from a subset of results.

        When a pitcher’s ERA is significantly different from their FIP, the standard credo is that they were lucky or unlucky, but there are genuine reasons why a pitcher might have results that are better or worse than their FIP. To illustrate this, let’s take a peak at the biggest FIP over and under-performers of 2014.

        There are all sorts of reasons why a particular pitcher might end up with a better or worse ERA than their FIP over the course of a season. Some of it is simply random variation. Anytime you have a statistic that estimates another, it won’t be perfect. So a 3.50 ERA with a 3.59 FIP is not worth noticing. You want to make note of large differences that are on the order of 0.30 runs or more. That’s not a hard and fast rule, but if it’s much less than that you just aren’t looking at anything very unusual.

        Beyond simple variation, here are some factors that can influence the ERA-FIP difference that aren’t “luck.”

        1. Defense
        2. Bullpen (stranding inherited runners or not)
        3. Sequencing (the order in which you allow hits/walks/outs)
        4. Quality of contact allowed
        5. Type of contact allow (batted ball type)
        6. Ability to control the running game

        There are probably other factors that play a role, but those are the big ones. The goal of FIP is to strip out the first two on this list. You want the statistic to be defense independent and you’d prefer if it could normalize what happens to the base runners you leave on the bases when a reliever follows you into the game. We don’t want to judge pitchers based on sequencing either, but it’s perfectly defensible if you want to attribute it to them when making retrospective evaluations, like in WAR.

        You would absolutely like to judge the quality and type of contact allowed, but FIP treats every ball in play the same. It’s a trade off you make in order to remove defense and one that you make because we know that a pitcher only has limited control over his BABIP. Finally, you would like to credit or debit a pitcher for how he holds runners, but again, FIP doesn’t control for that.

        To put it all together, the difference between ERA and FIP is not solely based on defense or luck. Some pitchers can influence the difference depending on their various skills and we’re always working to estimate just how much pitchers can do that.

        Now that we have a sense of the potential factors, let’s take a look at the pitchers who had the largest positive and negative ERA-FIP differences in 2014. With the dubious honor of the largest “under-performance,” Clay Buchholz comes in with a 5.33 ERA and 4.01 FIP (1.33 difference). On the other side, it’s Doug Fister’s 2.41 ERA and 3.93 FIP (-1.52 difference). You can use the Custom Leaderboards to compare their seasons.

        Let’s run through the different factors to see if we’re looking at luck or something meaningful, and then if that something meaningful is about the pitcher or the factors we want to remove from the analysis.

        Defense

        We can’t look directly at the precise defensive performance behind each player because that data isn’t available, but we can get a sense of how good their defenses were in general. The Nationals had +10 DRS and -6.3 UZR in 2013 with worse performances coming in the outfield. On average, the entire pitching staff had a slightly better ERA than FIP, but a good deal of that is driven by Fister’s large gap. Their BABIP allowed is .294 (including Fister’s .262 in 164 innings). We can’t say for sure, but it doesn’t appear as if the Nationals defense is extreme enough (think Tigers or Royals) to seriously influence a pitchers ERA-FIP difference. Certainly, defensive performance is asymmetric, but there aren’t signs that this is obviously about defense for Fister.

        Turning to Buchholz, the Red Sox pitchers didn’t have a big gap across the board and most of the starters had small ERA-FIP differences. Even more surprising is that the Sox had +27 DRS and a +48.5 UZR, so there isn’t much evidence that Buchholz is getting killed by his defense.

        Again, we can’t say for sure, but it doesn’t look like we’re getting a big effect. One small factor is that Fister allowed a slightly higher percentage of unearned runs than Buchholz. You could play with the numbers and maybe bring his ERA up to 2.70 if you wanted to normalize that effect. It’s hard to say, but Fister has a 2.85 RA9 and Buchholz has a 5.71 RA9. Do with that what you will.

        Bullpens

        There’s a very simple way to evaluate this effect. If you leave a runner on first base every time you get pulled, but the bullpen allows them to score every time, all of those runs aren’t really your fault. You should really only be charged for the expected number of runs, which we can approximate using RE24 on a per 9 inning scale. We’ll also have to park adjust their RA9. Here’s what we get (Note that these are park adjusted differently, so just use the numbers as a rough guide).

        • Fister – 2.85 pRA9, 3.04 RE24/9
        • Buchholz – 5.48 pRA9, 5.24 RE24/9

        So Fister’s bullpen is helping him a little bit and Buchholz’s is hurting him a little more. Fister left 10 men on the bases for his bullpen and only one scored. Buchholz left 21 on and 11 scored, so we have confirmed an effect!

        Sequencing

        This is a trickier one to measure, but we can use LOB% as an approximation. Buchholz’s has a very poor 62.1% and Fister’s is a robust 83.1%. Can we attribute this solely to sequencing? No. But the idea of sequencing is important. A single, single, home run, out, out, out in one inning counts for three runs while home run, single, single, out, out, out counts for just one run even though they are identical in everything but order.

        There isn’t evidence that pitchers can control the order of events, but you’re welcome to give them credit for it if you wish looking back. That said, the sequencing argument seems to be playing a role in the Fister and Buchholz ERA-FIP differences.

        Quality and Type of Contact

        So we can’t say very much about the quality of contact based on the data we have publicly available. It stands to reason that higher quality contact will lead to hits more often (we know that it does on average), but we don’t know how these factors play into Fister and Buchholz’s seasons.

        We can look at the type of contact, however. Ground balls go for hits more often than fly balls but less often than line drives, but they also don’t go for extra bases very much. The two pitchers had identical 34% fly ball rates and Fister’s two point lead in ground ball rate (about 49% to 47%) transfers to two extra points of line drive rate for Buchholz (19% to 17%). So you would expect a higher BABIP from Buchholz than Fister, but probably not a 50 point difference based only on trajectory.

        We think of Fister as a guy who induces weak contact, but we can’t say for sure exactly how much this matters.

        The Running Game

        This is one of FIP’s obvious limitations. If you allow a runner to reach base, but you also make it very easy for them to steal a base or get big jumps, you will allow more runs than if you are great at keeping them close to the base. And since we know that pitchers have a big influence over this part of the game, they should get credit for this.

        Fister and Buchholz both register with +1 stolen base runs, with Buchholz allowing six steals in 11 attempts (and 277 total opportunities). Fister allowed zero steals in one attempt (and 228 total chances). Some of this relates to the catcher, but it appears as if Fister probably gets a bit of a bump from his ability to control the running game and Buchholz is probably neutral.

        Summary

        What have we learned from this exercise? Their bullpens and sequencing certainly seem to have a big effect on things with an unknown amount coming from the quality of contact. It makes sense that Fister is beating his FIP and Buchholz isn’t, but we can’t know for sure exactly how much influence each factor has.

        Typically speaking, there are pitchers who have the right skills to allow them to beat their FIP consistently, but those combinations are relatively rare. Lefty, fly ball pitchers who don’t allow home runs come to mind, but even those guys on average don’t beat their FIP by more than a run per season most years. Obviously, some of Fister and Buchholz’s differences are simple randomness, but they do seem to also feature a few of the characteristics of guys who should have done a little better or worse in 2014.

        Fister’s beaten his FIP by about 20 points for his career, but Buchholz is also on the positive side of things. Some of this is a repeatable skill and some is luck and defense. It should serve as a reminder that the ERA-FIP gap is not simply about luck that will regress. There are lots of reasons why a pitcher’s FIP might be better or worse that you can identify, and then you can decide which of them should be credited to the pitcher and which should be left alone.

        Evaluating pitchers is very difficult. FIP is a great tool for doing so, but looking at in the context of ERA and RA9 can help you come to more useful conclusions. It’s a bit of work, but it will lead you to a much better place.

        Have questions? Ask them in the comments!





        Why It’s Always Better to Use Multiple Statistics
         
        What Exactly is a Projection?

        Neil Weinberg is the Site Educator at FanGraphs and can be found writing enthusiastically about the Detroit Tigers at New English D. Follow and interact with him on Twitter @NeilWeinberg44.

        3 Comments
        Oldest
        Newest Most Voted
        Inline Feedbacks
        View all comments
        Warren Bergmann
        9 years ago

        An ERA Question: A rookie pitcher is called up from the minors, pitches to one batter (who hits a home run), and is promptly sent back down to triple-A. He never returns to the majors. What is this pitcher’s career ERA?

        0
        Neil WeinbergMember since 2020
        9 years ago
        Reply to  Warren Bergmann

        Technically, infinity. Usually it’s shown as having no ERA. Can’t divide by zero.

        0
        MTN
        9 years ago

        +1 for “Fister’s large gap”

        0
        You are going to send email to

        Move Comment

        Updated: Saturday, May 10, 2025 6:53 AM ETUpdated: 5/10/2025 6:53 AM ET
        @fangraphs - Contact Us - Advertise - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
        sis_logo
        All major league baseball data including pitch type, velocity, batted ball location, and play-by-play data provided by Sports Info Solutions.
        mlb logo
        Major League and Minor League Baseball data provided by Major League Baseball.
        Mitchel Lichtman
        All UZR (ultimate zone rating) calculations are provided courtesy of Mitchel Lichtman.
        TangoTiger.com
        All Win Expectancy, Leverage Index, Run Expectancy, and Fans Scouting Report data licenced from TangoTiger.com
        Retrosheet.org
        Play-by-play data prior to 2002 was obtained free of charge from and is copyrighted by Retrosheet.